Xkcd statistics dating insider internet dating forum
Matt Yglesias has responded to me, although in a way that sort of misses the point I was trying to make.Part of his post is given over to reiterating the position that increasing the amount of housing stock in desirable cities would be a correct and egalitarian thing to do, even if it inconveniences some of the incumbent owners and residents. But he goes on to speculate that I hedged my position because it “makes [me] feel icky to embrace deregulation”, as though my critique were a symptom of an affective disorder. I’m actually quite a bit farther toward the left-neoliberal “deregulate and redistribute” end of things than many of my comrades on the Left.And hours on the job doesn’t cover all the other time people spend working: time spent commuting to work, time spent performing unpaid household and care work (which those on low wages often can’t buy paid replacements for), and what the sociologist Guy Standing calls “work-for-labor”: the work of looking for jobs, navigating state and private bureaucracies, networking, and other things that are preconditions for getting work but are themselves unpaid.
The finding that many people report working fewer hours than they would like reflects an economy in which many low-wage workers face uncertain schedules and enforced part-time hours that exclude them from benefits.Good moralistic scold that he is, Douthat sees the decline of work as part of “the broader turn away from community in America—from family breakdown and declining churchgoing to the retreat into the virtual forms of sport and sex and friendship.” It seems more plausible that it is neoliberal economic conditions themselves—a scaled back social safety net, precarious employment, rising, debts and uncertain incomes—that has produced whatever increase in anomie and isolation we experience.The answer to that is not more work but more protection from the life’s unpredictable risks, more income, more equality, more democracy—and more time beyond work to take advantage of all of it.As those numbers show, most of the decline in the participation rate was due to the recession (and some of the rest is probably due to demographic shifts).If the economy returned to full employment—that is, if everyone who wanted a job could actually find one—the participation rate would probably rise again. without a steady job”, when incomes have stayed flat for decades despite great increases in productivity?